Retrospective cohort study investigates GLP-1RA discontinuation in type 2 diabetes after bowel obstruction/ileus, suggesting significant clinical implications.
OBJECTIVE: Although concerns have been raised that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) may increase the risk of bowel obstruction or ileus, evidence remains inconclusive. In this context of uncertainty, we examined the frequency and determinants of GLP-1RA discontinuation after hospitalization for bowel obstruction/ileus. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Japanese health insurance claims database (DeSC). We identified individuals aged ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalized for bowel obstruction/ileus between 2016 and 2023 while receiving GLP-1RA therapy. The primary outcome was GLP-1RA discontinuation, defined as no prescription at discharge or within 6 months of discharge. Factors potentially associated with discontinuation were grouped into (1) general factors, (2) severity of bowel obstruction/ileus, and (3) potential therapeutic benefit of GLP-1RA therapy. Risk differences (RDs) for discontinuation were estimated using multivariable linear regression with robust standard errors. RESULTS: GLP-1RAs were discontinued in 86 (43.9%) of the 196 patients analyzed. Multivariable analysis revealed that surgery for bowel obstruction during hospitalization (RD = 32.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2% to 53.0%, p = 0.003), longer length of stay (≥15 days vs. ≤7 days; RD = 32.4%; 95% CI 11.2% to 53.5%, p = 0.003), and heart failure (RD = 17.6%; 95% CI 2.1% to 33.2%, p = 0.027) were associated with GLP-1RA discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of the patients discontinued GLP-1RAs after a bowel obstruction/ileus event. While GLP-1RAs were more likely to be discontinued after severe events, their potential therapeutic benefits appeared less frequently considered in continuation decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: