Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The expansion of surveillance in Central Asia has unfolded not as a neutral process of digital modernization but as a politically charged response to regime insecurity, mobility, and shifting geopolitical alignments. Focusing on Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, this article examines how surveillance infrastructures linked to China’s Digital Silk Road are embedded across distinct spatial and political sites, including urban camera networks in Almaty, border surveillance posts in the Ferghana Valley, and biometric databases and control systems along Turkmenistan’s southern frontier. Drawing on geospatial analysis, regional documentation, activist interviews, and digital ethnography of dissident networks, the study traces both the institutional adoption of Chinese surveillance technologies and the forms of resistance they provoke. Rather than producing a uniform model of digital authoritarianism, these systems are selectively adapted to existing coercive practices, allowing states to recalibrate sovereignty, manage sociopolitical tensions, and extend authority beyond conventional territorial boundaries. Surveillance thus functions simultaneously as an instrument of domestic political discipline and as a geopolitical interface through which China’s technological influence is consolidated. At the same time, these infrastructures generate new, adaptive forms of civic resistance, revealing surveillance as a contested field of power rather than a settled architecture of control.
Arash Beidollahkhani (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: