Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates gaze prediction performance in virtual reality applications, highlighting variability and error challenges.
Gaze prediction is essential for addressing motion-to-photon latency and ensuring seamless foveated rendering in Virtual Reality. The reliability of gaze forecasting is highly sensitive to individual differences and the eye movements being predicted. We evaluate recurrent, transformer-based, and classification-guided architectures to assess their generalization capabilities across oculomotor events. Using the GazeBase VR and Meta Quest Pro datasets, we analyzed the relationship between the median (P50) and high-percentile (P95) error profiles across subjects. The analysis reveals significant performance variability, showing that subjects with low P50 errors do not always exhibit the lowest extreme-case errors. Consequently, low median errors do not guarantee the robustness of the utilized solution. We discuss inference performance and address the class imbalance problem in short-term gaze prediction. These results identify a gap in standardized evaluation methods, necessitating a shift toward P95-focused, subject-specific metrics to develop reliable and perceptually stable gaze-contingent systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melnyk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: