Key result
Artificial neural network predicts 180-day VTE in lung cancer with ~0.82 AUROC, outperforming Khorana score.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is a common complication in lung cancer that remains difficult to predict accurately using existing risk assessment tools.
Does an Artificial Neural Network machine learning model accurately predict 180-day venous thromboembolism risk in patients with lung cancer?
Observational (n=7,959)
No
Does an Artificial Neural Network machine learning model accurately predict 180-day venous thromboembolism risk in patients with lung cancer?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.817 (95% CI 0.794-0.840)
An interpretable Artificial Neural Network model using 12 routine clinical variables can accurately predict 180-day VTE risk in lung cancer patients, potentially aiding in risk stratification and targeted thromboprophylaxis.
May aid VTE risk stratification in lung cancer; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with lung cancer and remains difficult to predict accurately using existing risk assessment tools. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for individualized prediction of VTE risk in patients with lung cancer. Methods A total of 7,959 patients with lung cancer from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital were included, among whom 1,333 developed VTE. Patients were randomly assigned to the training and testing cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Candidate predictors were identified from 67 clinical variables using multivariable logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Seven prediction models were developed based on the selected variables, including logistic regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, F1 score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, and SHapley Additive exPlanation was used to interpret feature contributions. Results Twelve variables were selected for model construction: sex, age, anticoagulant use, atherosclerosis, chemotherapy, intermittent pneumatic compression, radiotherapy, CYFRA21-1, NSE, central venous catheter placement, thrombin time, and D-dimer. Among the seven models, ANN showed the best overall performance, with the highest mean cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the training cohort (0.825 ± 0.016), a testing-cohort value of 0.817 (95% CI 0.794–0.840), and the highest F1 score. Calibration analysis showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, and decision curve analysis supported the potential clinical utility of the model across relevant threshold probabilities. SHapley Additive exPlanation further illustrated the contribution and relative importance of each predictor. Conclusion An interpretable ANN model was developed for individualized prediction of VTE risk in patients with lung cancer. The model incorporates 12 routinely available clinical variables and may support identification of patients at high risk of VTE, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Lung cancer (n=7,959). Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model vs. Khorana score was evaluated on Prediction of venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 180 days (AUROC in testing cohort) (AUROC 0.817, 95% CI 0.794-0.840). An Artificial Neural Network model incorporating 12 clinical variables achieved an AUROC of 0.817 for predicting 180-day venous thromboembolism risk in patients with lung cancer, significantly outperforming the Khorana score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: