Key result
This editorial discusses the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, specifically focusing on phospholamban p.Arg14del mutation carriers and left-dominant variants.
This editorial discusses the evolving understanding of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, highlighting the shift from right-dominant to biventricular and left-dominant forms and the role of genetic mutations in arrhythmic risk stratification.
This editorial refers to ‘Prediction of ventricular arrhythmia in phospholamban p.Arg14del mutation carriers: reaching the frontiers of individual risk prediction’, by T.E. Verstraelen et al. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab294. Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited heart muscle disease characterized by fibrofatty myocardial replacement that underlies structural and functional ventricular abnormalities and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias potentially responsible for sudden cardiac death (SCD).1,2 The original disease phenotype characterized by a predominant right ventricular involvement was termed ‘arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy’ (ARVC); however, the increasing identification of biventricular and left-dominant [also referred to as ‘arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy’ (ALVC)] forms has led to the use of the designation of ACM, which better defines the broad spectrum of the disease phenotypic variants also involving the left ventricle.2,3 In ∼50% of patients with ARVC, pathogenic mutations of genes encoding desmosomal proteins such as plakophilin (PKP2), desmoplakin (DSP), desmoglein (DSG2),...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corrado et al. (2021) conducted an editorial in Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. This editorial discusses the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, specifically focusing on phospholamban p.Arg14del mutation carriers and left-dominant variants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: