Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-identifiable statewide dataset analysis reveals increasing diagnoses of borderline personality disorder in consumers, highlighting the need for improved interventions.
Objective Few studies have examined the proportion Australian public sector mental health consumers with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Limiting their visibility in mental health policy and service planning decisions.Method We examined a non-identifiable statewide dataset comprising number of distinct consumers who had an episode of care closed each financial year. We identified consumers with an ICD-10-AM diagnosis of BPD recorded per financial year (BPD-current) or at any time up until June 2024 (BPD-anytime). Mann-Kendall (M-K) trend test examined BPD diagnosis over time and negative binomial regression analysis explored trend variation by sex.Results Between 2014 and 2024, the percentage of consumers with a diagnosis of BPD-current mental health services trended upwards in metropolitan (4.7% to 10.1%) and rural and remote (3.7% to 13.5%) regions. Examination of BPD-anytime data suggested that the percentage of mental health consumers with this diagnosis may be as high as 19%. Among distinct mental health consumers, the rates of a recorded diagnosis of BPD (current and anytime) were significantly higher in women compared to men.Conclusions People with a diagnosis of BPD represent a significant proportion of mental health service users, necessitating greater availability of evidence-based and recovery-focussed interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: