Reveals the effectiveness of regional analgesic strategies in lumbar spine surgery, suggesting enhanced transparency and reproducibility.
This repository contains the retrospective protocol, analysis decision timeline, locked arm-level dataset, contrast dataset, statistical code, final search strategies, PRISMA materials, RoB 2 assessments, CINeMA judgments, contribution matrices, and included-study source index for the systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis entitled “Comparative effectiveness of regional analgesic strategies across lumbar spine surgery types.” The five-node systematic review included 81 randomized controlled trials. Twenty-six trials contributed to at least one locked exact-data quantitative core, and the primary 24-hour resting-pain network meta-analysis included 23 randomized controlled trials and 1,544 participants. This archive was created retrospectively after completion of data extraction and analysis. It should not be interpreted as a prospective registration or preregistration. The materials are provided to enhance transparency, reproducibility, and independent verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: