Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review evaluates data analytics methods for energy benchmarking in campus buildings, suggesting future research directions.
Energy benchmarking of campus buildings has become an important research area as universities seek to reduce operational costs, improve sustainability, and support carbon-reduction goals. This review examines data-analytics approaches used for benchmarking campus building energy performance, with attention to methods, metrics, datasets, and research challenges. The literature shows that benchmarking studies often rely on energy use intensity, weather-normalized indicators, regression analysis, clustering, forecasting, and machine learning to compare buildings and identify inefficiencies. Common data sources include smart meters, utility bills, occupancy information, weather data, and building management systems. The review also highlights major challenges such as data quality, lack of standardized benchmarks, limited occupancy-aware modeling, and few campus-specific studies in developing contexts. Based on the review, future research should focus on real-time analytics, explainable AI, integrated sustainability indicators, and benchmarking frameworks suitable for university campuses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: