Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the thermal behavior in high-entropy metallic glass, suggesting implications for material applications.
The thermal stability and devitrification pathway of melt-spun high-entropy Cr16Mn16Fe16Co16Ni16P20 metallic glass were investigated using transmission electron microscopy/selected-area electron diffraction (TEM/SAED), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. TEM/SAED confirmed an amorphous ribbon structure, with diffuse rings and radial maxima at k1 = 0.84799 nm−1 and k2 = 1.44459 nm−1. Non-isothermal DSC revealed two exothermic events, Peak I at ~716–752 K and Peak II at ~881–930 K, both shifting to higher temperatures with increasing heating rate. Kissinger analysis yielded apparent activation energies of Ea1 = 359.2 kJ/mol for Peak I and Ea2 = 414.9 kJ/mol for Peak II. Specimens heated in the DSC under argon at 20 K/min to selected target temperatures were examined ex situ. The XRD patterns are consistent with the onset of crystallization during Peak I, with reflections tentatively attributed to an Fe3P-type phase and an FCC solid solution. Peak II is associated with further phase evolution, including the development of reflections compatible with MnNi-type and Co2P-type phases. Because of peak overlap in this multicomponent alloy, the proposed phase sequence should be regarded as a plausible interpretation based on combined DSC, XRD, and Mössbauer evidence rather than as a uniquely resolved quantitative phase analysis. Mössbauer spectra reveal three paramagnetic Fe environments. With increasing DSC target temperature, the high-QS Fe3 component, representing a highly distorted Fe environment, decreases systematically, whereas the low-QS Fe1 component, associated with a more symmetric, nearly cubic Fe environment, becomes dominant. The high apparent activation energies indicate a larger effective kinetic barrier than in many simpler transition-metal–phosphorus amorphous alloys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziewiec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: