Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals a parameter-free classification of the dark sector, suggesting significant implications for particle physics.
The Universal Generative Principle (UGP) derives the Standard Model spectrum from a parameter-free arithmetic sieve at ridge n=10. The prime-lock mechanism that selects the SM lepton seed (1,73,823) simultaneously forces a mirror-branch seed (1,73,2137), predicting a complete dark sector with no free parameters. We derive the Mirror Branch Braid Atlas—the dark sector particle classification table. The electric charge Q=0 for all dark particles is derived from Braid Atlas topology, not assumed: the mirror Z_2 involution is an internal GTE arithmetic symmetry, not an SM gauge transformation. The dark sector gauge group is SU(3)_dark only—no dark SU(2)_L exists. Three generations of free dark leptons at 0.54MeV, 24.5MeV, and 3.60GeV coexist with confined dark quarks near Λ_dark~ 200MeV. We establish a new structural connection: c(W) = b_2(RHN) = q_1 in both branches—the first cross-sector structural unification in UGP Physics. The core results are machine-certified in Lean~4 ( .lean, .lean, .lean; zero sorry, zero custom axioms). The dark neutrino mass-squared ratio R_dark = 0.208 is 7× larger than the SM ratio ( : MDL doublet-pairing derivation of b_3'=37). The FIMP mechanism overproduces dark matter by 4.84×10^6 at λ_s ~ 10^-6; the leading resolution is asymmetric dark matter with η_χ ≈ (2/7)η_B+L,pre, where 2/7 = (Z_7 charge of dark baryon)/(Z_7 group order). The most accessible prediction is GTE-P7 at 211.9MeV—a Tier~1 target at Belle~II. The baryogenesis derivation and dark confinement scale are identified as primary open problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nova Spivack (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: