Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates electrode diameter impact on track morphology and process window in 316L stainless steel.
Powder-bed arc additive manufacturing (PBAAM) is a low-cost alternative powder bed fusion process that uses a TIG arc as heat source. This study systematically investigates the effect of electrode diameter (φ = 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mm) on single-track morphology and process window in inclined-bed PBAAM of 316L stainless steel powder. Twenty-seven full-factorial combinations of three current levels (I = 20, 25, 30 A) and three travel speeds (v = 2, 3, 4 mm/s) were evaluated using an image analysis framework based on Otsu thresholding with expert manual correction. Maximum gap length (L_gap) and width coefficient of variation (CV = σ_w/w̄) metrics were compared across six threshold scenarios (S1–S6); S5 (L_gap) = 0.50 mm, CV = 0.15) was identified as the most appropriate combination based on physical justification and literature consistency. Process map analysis revealed travel speed v as the most critical parameter governing the process window: at v = 2 mm/s, 9/9 combinations (100%) produced continuous tracks; at v = 4 mm/s, only 5/9 (56%) were continuous. Multiple linear regression models achieved R² = 0.626 for mean track width w̄ and R² = 0.562 for CV. Electrode diameter φ significantly affects track width (β_φ = 0.762, p = 0.019) but has no significant linear effect on width uniformity CV (p = 0.955); CV is primarily governed by I and v. The φ = 0.8 mm electrode confined all Fragmented/Balling combinations to v = 4 mm/s only and produced approximately 35% lower mean CV (0.184) than the other two electrode diameters for continuous tracks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balcı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: