Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates correlation functions may not uniquely identify physical systems, suggesting implications for model identification.
Correlation estimates are not necessarily unique fingerprints of physical systems. This paper presents an explicit coherent-detection model showing that the normalised correlation function -cos(a-b) can arise from a deterministic local classical system, while the corresponding raw correlations remain fully Bell compliant. The increase from |S| = √2 to |S| = 2√2 is shown to originate entirely from Pearson variance normalisation applied to the measured observables, with no change in the underlying physical mechanism. The work does not claim a violation of Bell's theorem. Instead, it addresses a model-identification problem: different physical mechanisms may generate identical reported correlation functions. The observation of a cosine correlation or a CHSH value of 2√2 is therefore not, by itself, sufficient for unique identification of the underlying mechanism when only the reported correlation statistics are available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberto Pavani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: