Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study develops a written language assessment tool for children with cleft lip and palate, indicating its reliability and validity.
BACKGROUND: Evidence on written language assessment remains limited in Persian-speaking children, particularly in clinical populations such as children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), who may present with higher-order language difficulties. This study aimed to develop and validate the Persian Written Language Assessment Profile (PWLAP). METHODS: A sequential mixed-methods design was used. In Phase I, the PWLAP was developed through literature review, expert interviews, and a two-round Delphi process involving 14 specialists. In Phase II, the profile was administered to 184 Persian-speaking students in grades 3-6 (128 typically developing (TD) and 56 with CL/P). Written language was evaluated using lexical measures (total number of words, number of different words, and type-token ratio) and morphosyntactic indices (T-unit measures, clause production, clausal complexity, and morphosyntactic errors). Reliability analyses demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95). CONCLUSION: The PWLAP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing written language in Persian-speaking students and may be useful in assessment of written language in children with CL/P.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: