Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a new framework for classifying historic facades, suggesting improved reproducibility.
Historic facade classification is generally based on qualitative assessments, limiting reproducibility and quantitative comparison. This study introduces the Heritage DNA (HDNA) framework, a descriptor-based approach integrating Morphological DNA (MDNA) and Material DNA (MaDNA) for the quantitative characterization of historic facades. Thirty-one facades from the Tepebağ Historic District (Adana, Türkiye) were documented using close-range photogrammetry and represented through a nine-dimensional HDNA vector. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering were employed to identify facade patterns and typological relationships. The first two principal components explained 50.38% of the total variance, while the four-cluster solution produced a silhouette coefficient of 0.256. Hierarchical clustering identified four facade clusters, which were subsequently interpreted as four facade families characterized by distinct morphological and material compositions. The results demonstrate that facade identity can be represented through measurable descriptor combinations, providing a reproducible framework for facade classification. The proposed HDNA approach offers a potentially transferable descriptor-based methodology for comparative heritage studies and data-driven heritage management, subject to further validation across different historic contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kılıç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: