Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Children in early childhood experience higher rates of suspension and expulsion than K–12 students, with persistent racial disparities. Methods: This retrospective descriptive observational study examined exclusionary practices among children ages 0–5 reported by providers participating in a state-level Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation (IECMHC) initiative within the United States. Results: Providers (n = 689) reported that 3.50% of children were excluded in the 12 months prior to service initiation (1.90% suspended; 1.60% expelled), with higher rates among older children (ages 3–5), males, and Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) children. Among a subset of providers of children (n = 395) receiving child-and-family-focused (CFF) consultation, only 28 were expelled (7.09%), with the highest rate observed in children ages 30–36 months. Children expelled during CFF consultation more frequently exhibited atypical protective factors, elevated behavioral concerns, aggression at referral, and higher cumulative adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Conclusions: Findings suggest that CFF consultation may help mitigate childcare exclusionary practices when children present with severe social-emotional-behavioral challenges. Important considerations for future childcare research and prevention efforts are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fraczek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: