Compares traffic-signal controllers, showing PGQL improves efficiency in urban grids, suggesting effective traffic management methods.
This study compares five traffic-signal controllers on a 3×3 SUMO grid and validates the principal findings on a 5×5 grid. The controllers are fixed-time, gap-out actuated, max-pressure, independent tabular Q-learning, and a new hybrid called Pressure-Guided Q-Learning (PGQL). PGQL augments a Q-learner with three actions (hold, follow max-pressure, override max-pressure) and warm-starts the Q-table so the untrained agent initially behaves like max-pressure while learning state-dependent deviations. On the 3×3 grid, the pressure-aware controllers reduced mean waiting time (MWT) by about threefold relative to fixed-time at moderate load. Relative to max-pressure, PGQL was worse at low load, tied near saturation, and better post-saturation. On the 5×5 grid, PGQL outperformed max-pressure at every tested load by up to 6.6%. An action audit showed that learned overrides increased from 28% at low load to 37% under saturation. An ablation replacing max-pressure with gap-out actuation as the warm-start reduced post-saturation performance by about 12%, demonstrating that the choice of warm-start expert matters. Cold-start experiments showed that warm-start primarily improves initialization safety rather than final low-load performance. Plotting MWT against the mean number of vehicles in the network, rather than offered demand, avoids a post-saturation measurement artefact and supports an M/M/1-style carrying-capacity model with a single physically meaningful capacity parameter. The results show that classical adaptive control and reinforcement learning can be combined to achieve measurable post-saturation improvements while retaining max-pressure behavior at initialization, although its formal stability proof does not extend to the learned policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Advik Singh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: