What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to understand how structural silence leads to decay in belief and cognitive instability.

July 16, 2026Open Access

Structural Silence & Belief Decay

Key Points

The aim is to understand how structural silence leads to decay in belief and cognitive instability.
Developed a mathematical model for belief and silence interactions.
Created core equations defining cognitive processes affected by silence.
Analyzed the dynamics of belief decay and acceptance thresholds.
Identified conditions leading to the erosion of belief under structured silence.
Established the Diminishing Belief Cascade trajectory mathematically.
Defined the Acceptance Collapse threshold critical for cognitive integrity.

Abstract

Silence Field V3: Structural Silence the surrounding structure does. V3 models the erosion that follows: belief decay, silence accumulation, drift into doubt, and the threshold where acceptance collapse becomes possible. It is the first field where silence becomes an active variable rather than a passive absence. Readers should expect a mathematically defined trajectory of cognitive erosion, a structural explanation of how silence shapes perception, and the full equation set governing the Diminishing Belief Cascade. Core Equations: Council Paradox: Silence Perceived Invalidity\ Diminishing Belief Cascade: dt = -k \ Silence Persistence Operator: \ = S t\ Lasting Effect Field: = \, dt\ Self-Doubt Drift: \ = f (D (t), ) \ Acceptance Collapse Threshold: (t) < D₂ₑ₈ₓ\ This field captures the moment truth remains intact but belief begins to decay under structural silence. It is the cognitive inflection point where V2’s equilibrium fails and V3’s erosion begins. Contact: For enquiries or research questions related to this work, email matthewcarlo. research@gmail. com

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper