Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diagnostic analysis quantifies seasonal flexibility challenges in Nepal's power system, suggesting strategic storage investment is essential for reliability.
Nepal's power system, dominated by run-of-river hydropower, faces a critical seasonal flexibility challenge, characterized by significant energy surpluses in the wet season and severe power deficits in the dry season. This study conducts a comprehensive flexibility assessment of the Integrated Nepal Power System (INPS) to quantify these operational gaps and evaluate the role of storage hydropower as a mitigating solution. Using the FlexTool, a power balance simulation was performed on a single-node model of the INPS. The analysis reveals that in the 2025 base case, the system fails to serve 5.68% of the annual demand while simultaneously curtailing a massive 5.22 TWh of variable renewable energy (VRE). A sensitivity analysis demonstrates that increasing the share of storage hydropower is highly effective; a generation mix with 35% storage capacity virtually eliminates loss of load and reduces VRE curtailment by 76%. Future scenarios for 2030 indicate that achieving national capacity targets is crucial, but even then, a storage share of 20-30% will be required to maintain reliability under high-growth and policy-driven demand scenarios. The findings underscore the need for a capacity expansion planning with strategic investment in seasonal storage to ensure flexibility and efficient use of renewable resources in Nepal's power system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dharel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: