Demonstrates asymptotic scaling in curvature moments, indicating unique geometric properties.
This paper introduces a one-parameter Brown–York resolvent functional: the resolvent map A → A(I − tA)⁻¹ is applied to the physical and reference shape operators of a closed spacelike two-surface. The zero-scale member is exactly the Brown–York quasilocal energy, and the density is the logarithmic derivative of the flat-model normal-offset determinant, so the family is geometrically distinguished rather than an arbitrary analytic deformation. Its Taylor coefficients are the reference-subtracted power sums of the principal curvatures; the second coefficient carries a mean-curvature-square contribution related by the Gauss equation to Willmore and Hawking-type curvature data. The main theorem is a large-sphere asymptotic scale law: under standard asymptotically flat hypotheses, if t(r)/r → α with |α| < 1, the resolvent energy tends to M_ADM/(1 − α)², so the ADM normalization is recovered throughout the sublinear sector. Mean-curvature ordering alone does not determine monotonicity in t. By contrast, ordered principal curvatures with 0 ≤ κ_i ≤ κ̄_i make the family absolutely monotone: every t-derivative is nonnegative, strictly under strict ordering on a set of positive area. In a time-symmetric spherically symmetric slice, the family obeys an exact radial balance law at fixed fractional scale t = αr; on the Schwarzschild exterior it is globally decreasing outward exactly when α ≤ 1/3, and an exact scale-independent transform of E_t recovers the Misner–Sharp mass, as a calibration rather than a new mass. For nonzero t the functional is treated as a reference-calibrated geometric surface functional, not a Hamiltonian boundary charge; that analysis is carried out in the companion paper, "Brown–York Resolvent Energy: Dirichlet Obstruction and a Resolvent–Robin Boundary Condition" (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20650879). Version 3 retitles the paper (previously "A Scale-Dependent Brown–York Resolvent Functional for Quasilocal Energy: Curvature Moments and an Asymptotic Scale Law") and adds the log-determinant motivation, the absolute-monotonicity theorem, the spherical radial balance law with its sharp threshold, and the Misner–Sharp reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russell David Moore (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: