Key result
Streamlined three-sequence MRI with clinical metadata outperforms full protocols for classifying rotator cuff tears.
Why the study?
The optimal deep learning integration of heterogeneous multi-sequence MRI series and clinical metadata for rotator cuff tear classification remains unresolved.
Does a hierarchical multimodal fusion of selected MRI sequences and clinical metadata improve the classification of rotator cuff tears compared to single-sequence or full-protocol baselines?
Cohort (n=199)
No
Does a hierarchical multimodal fusion of selected MRI sequences and clinical metadata improve the classification of rotator cuff tears compared to single-sequence or full-protocol baselines?
Selecting complementary MRI sequences (T2 and PD) combined with clinical metadata optimizes deep learning classification of rotator cuff tears better than aggregating entire clinical protocols.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Streamlined MRI subsets plus metadata may enhance rotator cuff tear classification efficiency; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background/Objectives: Rotator cuff tears are a leading cause of shoulder disability. While multi-sequence MRI is standard, the optimal deep learning integration of heterogeneous image series and clinical metadata remains unresolved. This study evaluated a hierarchical, sequence-aware multimodal framework for patient-level binary rotator cuff tear classification. Methods: A single-center cohort of 199 patients (100 tears, 99 controls) was analyzed across four MRI sequences (T1 coronal, T2 fat-suppressed sagittal, and proton density [PD] fat-suppressed coronal and transverse/axial) and nine demographic features. Under a patient-level stratified three-fold cross-validation scheme preventing data leakage, we evaluated ResNet50 and Vision Transformer baselines (Study 0), full-protocol fusion topologies (Study 1), and systematically mapped sequence-subset combinations with or without metadata (Study 2). Results: In Study 0, the PD coronal ResNet50 model was the top baseline (AUC = 0.9834, F1 = 0.9515). In Study 1, late decision fusion yielded the highest AUC (0.9909), while feature concatenation optimized threshold balance (F1 = 0.9502). In Study 2, a streamlined three-sequence subset with metadata (C14M: T2 + PDc + PDt) achieved peak performance (AUC = 0.9961, 95% CI: 0.9823–0.9987, F1 = 0.9618, MCC = 0.9238), outperforming the full protocol (AUC = 0.9909, F1 = 0.9355). Metadata utility was configuration-dependent, assisting only fluid-sensitive combinations. Conclusions: Rather than indiscriminately aggregating entire clinical protocols, multimodal fusion is optimized by selecting complementary imaging series. For binary classification, excluding non-fat-suppressed T1 images in favor of a streamlined T2 and PD set stabilized by clinical demographics maximized classification performance in this internally validated, single-center cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aşık et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Rotator cuff tears (n=199). Streamlined three-sequence MRI subset with clinical metadata vs. Full MRI protocol was evaluated on Patient-level binary rotator cuff tear classification (AUC 0.9961, 95% CI 0.9823-0.9987). A streamlined three-sequence MRI subset with clinical metadata achieved peak classification performance for rotator cuff tears (AUC 0.9961; 95% CI 0.9823-0.9987), outperforming the full protocol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: