Key result
Higher RDW-SD linked to ~23% greater risk of severe in-stent restenosis per 0.5 fL.
Why the study?
The relationship between RDW-SD and the angiographic severity and morphological complexity of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis had not been systematically characterized.
Does elevated RDW-SD associate with severe in-stent restenosis and complex morphology in patients undergoing repeat coronary angiography after DES implantation?
Observational (n=290)
No
Does elevated RDW-SD associate with severe in-stent restenosis and complex morphology in patients undergoing repeat coronary angiography after DES implantation?
RDW-SD is a readily available biomarker that independently correlates with the angiographic severity and morphological complexity of drug-eluting stent restenosis.
Background and Objectives: Red cell distribution width–standard deviation (RDW-SD) has been associated with systemic inflammation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its relationship with the angiographic severity and morphological complexity of drug-eluting stent-in-stent restenosis (ISR) has not been systematically characterized. The present study investigated whether RDW-SD is associated with angiographic restenosis severity and restenotic lesion complexity, and compared its performance with the platelet distribution width (PDW), Metabolic Stress Index (MSI), and Platelet-to-HDL Ratio (PHR). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, 290 patients undergoing clinically indicated repeat coronary angiography following prior drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation were enrolled. Angiographic luminal narrowing was quantified by QCA and categorized as reference (<50% in-stent luminal narrowing; n = 111), intermediate ISR (50–69%; n = 76), and severe ISR (≥70%; n = 103). The Mehran classification was applied to patients with ISR ≥50% and dichotomized as Mehran class I–II (n = 91) vs. Mehran class III–IV (n = 70). Multivariable logistic regression, hierarchical modeling, and incremental discrimination analyses (IDI and NRI) were performed for both binary outcomes. Results: RDW-SD differed significantly across angiographic severity groups (Kruskal–Wallis H = 51.14, p < 0.001), being highest in the ISR ≥70% group [44.6 fL (IQR 43.8–45.3)] and lowest in the ISR 50–69% group [43.2 fL (42.7–43.7)]. A parallel pattern was observed across Mehran class (H = 50.57, p < 0.001; Mehran class III–IV: 44.9 fL [44.2–45.8]). In multivariable analysis, RDW-SD independently associated with ISR ≥70% (OR = 1.228 per 0.5 fL, 95% CI 1.122–1.344, p < 0.001) and Mehran class III–IV (OR = 1.274, 95% CI 1.155–1.406, p < 0.001). Hierarchical modeling showed that adding RDW-SD improved the AUC from 0.603 to 0.719 for ISR ≥ 70% and from 0.592 to 0.757 for Mehran class III–IV (LRT p < 0.001 for both), with incrementally larger IDI and NRI gains for the Mehran class III–IV outcome. PDW did not retain significance after adjustment; MSI and PHR were not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusions: RDW-SD was independently associated with both angiographic ISR severity and Mehran morphological complexity in patients with established drug-eluting stent restenosis, with numerically greater model discrimination for the Mehran class III–IV endpoint. These findings suggest that RDW-SD may provide complementary information regarding restenosis burden and complexity in patients with established ISR. Prospective studies are required to validate these observations and determine their clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savcilioglu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Drug-eluting stent-in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR) (n=290). Red cell distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD) vs. Lower RDW-SD levels was evaluated on Severe in-stent restenosis (≥70% diameter stenosis) (OR 1.228, 95% CI 1.122-1.344, p=<0.001). Higher RDW-SD was independently associated with severe angiographic in-stent restenosis (≥70%) (OR 1.228 per 0.5 fL increase) and complex Mehran class III-IV morphology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: