Key result
A history of diabetes was associated with an increased frequency of general practitioner visits in the 6 months following acute coronary syndrome (IRR 1.25; 95% CI 1.21-1.31).
Why the study?
Is the frequency of medical consultations after ACS associated with differences in lifestyle, clinical measures, and medication prescription?
Cohort
Yes
Is the frequency of medical consultations after ACS associated with differences in lifestyle, clinical measures, and medication prescription?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frequent general practitioner visits in the 6 months following an acute coronary syndrome are associated with better secondary prevention measures, including cardiac rehabilitation participation and cardioprotective medication prescription.
OBJECTIVE: Initiatives that support primary care to better enable delivery of optimal prevention services are of great importance. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of medical consultations by patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the 6 months after hospital discharge and to determine whether the frequency of visits was associated with differences in lifestyle, clinical measures and medication prescription. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective subgroup analysis of data collected in the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE), which is an ongoing (prospective) clinical initiative providing continuous real-time reporting on the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients admitted to Australian hospitals with ACS. We compared clinical measures, medications, smoking status and receipt of cardiac rehabilitation with frequency of medical consultations 6 months after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Patients with ACS visited their general practitioner (GP) a mean of 4.4 (± 3.8) times and their cardiologist 1.2 (± 0.9) times in the 6-month period after their index admission. Patients who saw a GP in the 6-month period had significantly higher rates of participation in cardiac rehabilitation, receipt of dietary advice and prescription of cardioprotective medications. Factors associated with increased frequency of GP visits were older age groups (oldest fourth vs youngest fourth incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.08; 95% CI 1.01, 1.14), being female (male vs female IRR 0.83; 95% CI 0.80, 0.86), diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (STEMI vs non-STEMI IRR 1.08; 95% CI 1.04, 1.13; STEMI vs unstable angina IRR 1.01; 95% CI 0.95, 1.06), being a current smoker (IRR 1.09; 95% CI 1.05, 1.15), history of cardiovascular disease (IRR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01, 1.12), history of diabetes (IRR 1.25; 95% CI 1.21, 1.31), inpatient revascularisation (IRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91, 0.99), receipt of cardiac rehabilitation referral (IRR 0.93; 95% CI 0.89, 0.97), and discharged on four or more out of five indicated medications (IRR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00, 1.08). CONCLUSION: The majority of ACS survivors in this study saw their GP frequently and their cardiologist at least once during the 6 months after index admission. Seizing these opportunities to engage, manage and support patients is important for strengthening prevention in primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyun et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome. History of diabetes vs. No history of diabetes was evaluated on Increased frequency of general practitioner visits (IRR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21-1.31). A history of diabetes was associated with an increased frequency of general practitioner visits in the 6 months following acute coronary syndrome (IRR 1.25; 95% CI 1.21-1.31).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: