Key result
The new Lake Louise Criteria significantly improved the detection of acute myocarditis compared to the old criteria (58.8% vs 38.2% positivity), particularly in atypical cardiomyopathic presentations.
Why the study?
The study was designed to compare the diagnostic performance of old and new Lake Louise Criteria across different clinical presentations of acute myocarditis: infarct-like, cardiomyopathic, and arrhythmic.
Does the new Lake Louise Criteria improve CMR detection of acute myocarditis compared to the old criteria in patients with suspected acute myocarditis?
Observational (n=102)
Blinded image analysis
No
Does the new Lake Louise Criteria improve CMR detection of acute myocarditis compared to the old criteria in patients with suspected acute myocarditis?
The new Lake Louise Criteria improve the diagnostic performance of CMR for acute myocarditis, particularly for atypical clinical presentations such as cardiomyopathic onset.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid CMR diagnosis in atypical myocarditis; extends validation of new criteria but remains hypothesis-generating.
The purpose of our study was to compare diagnostic performance of old and new Lake Louise Criteria (oLLC and nLLC) among different clinical presentations: infarct-like (IL), cardiomyopathic (CM) and arrhythmic (AR). 102 patients with clinical suspicion of acute myocarditis underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) on a 1.5 T scanner. Protocol included cine-SSFP, T2-weighted STIR, T2 mapping, early and late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping acquired before and after gadolinium administration. The degree of agreement has been calculated with Cohen's K test. 42 patients also underwent endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). IL onset was present in 54/102 patients, CM in 28/102 and AR in 20/102. nLLC were positive in 58.3% of the patients, while oLLC in 37.9%, k = 0.57 (IC: 0.428-0.713). The degree of agreement between nLLC and oLLC was 0.49 (IC: 0.111-0.876) for AR onset (nLLC positive in 35% vs oLLC in 15%), 0.25 (IC: 0.035-0.459) for CM pattern (nLLC positive in 60.7% vs oLLC 17.9%) and 0.73 (IC: 0.543-0.912) for IL presentation (nLLC positive in 66.7% vs oLLC in 57.4%). Diagnostic accuracy was 75% for both nLLC and oLLC among IL onset, and 41.6% for oLLC vs 66.7% for nLLC, as regards CM clinical presentation. nLLC have improved diagnostic performance of CMR for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis, in particular for atypical clinical presentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cundari et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Acute myocarditis (n=102). New Lake Louise Criteria (nLLC) vs. Old Lake Louise Criteria (oLLC) was evaluated on Detection of acute myocarditis (Cohen's k 0.57, 95% CI 0.428-0.713, p=<0.01). The new Lake Louise Criteria significantly improved the detection of acute myocarditis compared to the old criteria (58.8% vs 38.2% positivity), particularly in atypical cardiomyopathic presentations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: