Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This project develops a toolkit to enhance family and clinician engagement in early intervention services, suggesting improvements for collaboration.
Purpose Genuine engagement in paediatric speech-language pathology is co-constructed by families and speech-language pathologists over time. However, research about how speech-language pathologists work with families to understand and respond to their needs is limited. This project aimed to design a toolkit to facilitate shared conversations about engagement in an early intervention service for children (0–8 years).Method In Phase 1, focus groups with speech-language pathologists (n = 20) explored key aspects of engagement and generated ideas for tools. In Phase 2, an online survey with these clinicians explored the format of two tools: 1) A template for ‘getting to know a family’, and 2) a ‘living document’ to record goals and have conversations about working together. In Phase 3, separate focus groups were conducted with clinicians (n = 20) and parents (n = 9) to design and refine the tools.Result Reflexive thematic analysis of Phase 1 data resulted in two overarching themes: 1) Engaging with families at the start; and 2) Reflecting with families throughout their journey. Content analysis of Phase 2 survey responses informed draft tools. Phase 3 findings informed the final tools.Conclusion This project identified opportunities to support engagement and developed a toolkit to facilitate conversations between families and speech-language pathologists in early intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melvin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: