Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals improved accuracy in lithium determination using LIBS, suggesting better analytical practices.
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was applied for the quantitative determination of lithium in four certified reference materials (CRMs) of lithium-bearing pegmatite ores. These CRMs cover a wide range of lithium concentrations (0.47 − 2.67 wt.% Li) and were prepared as graphite-bound pellets by hydraulic pressing. Calibration curves were constructed using five Li I emission lines at 460.3, 497.2, 610.4, 670.8, and 812.6 nm. Among them, the strong emission lines at 610.4 and 670.8 nm apparently exhibited low sensitivity due to self-absorption, whereas the weaker emission line at 460.3 nm showed nearly linear sensitivity with concentration, free from self-absorption effects. In this study, self-absorption and plasma temperature fluctuation were identified as the main factors affecting calibration performances such as sensitivity and accuracy, respectively. To avoid the degradation of sensitivity caused by self-absorption, weak emission lines must be selected. Once the influence of self-absorption is eliminated, the intensity fluctuations originating from plasma temperature variation become evident and can be corrected. By compensating for temperature-induced variation in the intensity of the non-self-absorbed Li I 460.3 nm line, a parameter proportional to the number density of Li atoms was obtained for calibration, resulting in a remarkable reduction in the root mean square error of calibration from 0.0287 wt.% to 0.0035 wt.% and a substantial improvement in accuracy. Our results suggest that, in univariate LIBS determination of lithium in pegmatite ores, selecting weak, non-self-absorbed emission lines and compensating for temperature-induced signal variation can substantially improve overall analytical performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: