Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how temporal-experiential distance affects episodic simulations in young adults, indicating implications for memory processes.
This study investigates the shared constructive processes involved in past- and future-oriented episodic simulations, defined as mentally generating detailed, context-specific events, and examines how temporal-experiential distance shapes these simulations in virtual reality (VR). Young adults used a VR “time machine” that placed them in four temporally cued environments (1980, 2020, 2024, 2060). The near-past and near-future contexts (2020, 2024) fell within participants' current autobiographical lifetime and ongoing personal goals (experiential), whereas the distant-past and distant-future contexts (1980, 2060) did not (non-experiential). In each context, participants followed instructions to recall or imagine a specific personal event set in that time period, thereby generating a self-involving episodic simulation. In Experiment 1, episodicity (indexed by specificity, contextual anchoring, and phenomenological richness) decreased with increasing temporal-experiential distance in a similar way for past- and future-oriented simulations. In Experiment 2, participants first encoded objects from semantic categories in a virtual museum and then generated near or distant past- or future-oriented episodic simulations that concerned half of these categories. A simulation-induced forgetting effect (reduced recall for simulated vs non-simulated categories) emerged only for near, experiential contexts. These findings support the existence of a shared episodic simulation mechanism for past and future thought, modulated by the influence of temporal-experiential distance, and highlight VR time machines as ecologically oriented, experimentally controlled tools for studying episodic simulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LESUR et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: