Observational study evaluates PRAM for predicting hospital admission and stay duration in children with asthma exacerbations, suggesting its clinical utility.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score for hospital admission and prolonged stay risk stratification in the emergency department (ED) at different time points. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected protocol data (August 2023-March 2025) at a tertiary pediatric ED. Patients aged 2-17 years with acute asthma exacerbations were included; those with systemic comorbidities, other chronic lung diseases, or confounding acute conditions were excluded. PRAM was assessed hourly (PRAM 0 to 4). Outcomes were hospital admission and prolonged ED stay (> 3 h). RESULTS: A total of 428 visits were analyzed (35.0% hospital admission rate). PRAM demonstrated satisfactory discriminatory capacity for admission at triage (AUC: 0.791; 95% CI: 0.745-0.836; p < 0.001), with optimized accuracy during serial assessments, performing best at the second hour (PRAM 2; AUC: 0.829; 95% CI: 0.773-0.885; p < 0.001). For predicting prolonged ED stay, the score showed moderate accuracy at the second hour (AUC: 0.677; p < 0.001), with no significant correlation between sequential scores and time to admission decision (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PRAM is a valuable, dynamic risk-stratification tool for pediatric asthma exacerbations. Serial assessments provide superior prognostic accuracy compared to a single static measurement at admission by actively reflecting therapeutic response. Although its ability to predict operational outcomes is restricted by non-clinical factors, the score demonstrates consistent utility for standardizing clinical assessment and supporting medical disposition in the ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pergo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: