Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial examines how game structures influence academic motivation in children, suggesting implications for educational practices.
Academic motivation declines during late childhood, yet the relationship between motivational experiences in physical education and broader academic motivation remains underexplored. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this randomized pre – post experimental study examined whether competitive and noncompetitive physical education game structures differentially influence children’s academic motivation. A total of 246 children (aged 10–13) were assigned to Competitive Game, Educational (noncompetitive) Game, or Technical Education control groups for a 10-week intervention (3 × 40 minutes weekly). Academic motivation was assessed using the 28-item Academic Motivation Scale. Mixed-design ANOVAs revealed significant group × time interactions across all seven motivational dimensions (all p < 0.001; η2 p = 0.09–.17). Both intervention groups showed increases in intrinsic and extrinsic regulations and significant decreases in amotivation, whereas the control group showed no meaningful change. Competitive and noncompetitive formats produced distinct regulatory profiles, suggesting that instructional game structure may be associated with differences in motivational outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: