Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis examines postoperative complications in men and women undergoing pelvic exenteration, suggesting surgical approach impacts outcomes.
PURPOSE: To investigate the sex-related differences in postoperative complications following pelvic exenteration. METHODS: This retrospective subanalysis used a multicenter registry of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. We included 218 patients (177 men and 41 women) in this study. The sex-related differences in postoperative complications were evaluated, and sex-by-factor interactions were assessed using logistic regression models, including sex, each perioperative factor, and the corresponding interaction term. In open surgery, Grade II or higher complications occurred in 82.7% (43/52) of men compared with 38.5% (5/13) of women, whereas no clear sex difference was observed in minimally invasive surgery (69.6% [87/125] vs. 75.0% [21/28]). No significant sex-by-surgical approach interaction was detected for grade III or higher complications. Conversely, a significant sex-by-operative time interaction was observed, which was not apparent for Grade II complications. CONCLUSION: Sex-related differences in postoperative complications after pelvic exenteration were not uniform but emerged with increased surgical invasiveness. Therefore, sex may affect the postoperative risk under conditions of increased surgical stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: