Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reviewing current advancements in molecularly imprinted membranes for efficient separation in various applications, indicating significant progress.
Molecularly imprinted membranes (MIMs) have demonstrated tremendous potential in the field of high-efficiency separation due to their specific molecular recognition capabilities. This review aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing MIMs’ performance and, moving beyond traditional classification frameworks, systematically reconstructs the classification system for MIMs from the perspectives of the spatial distribution of imprinted sites, the chemical topology of the matrix, and mass transfer kinetics. The article focuses on the decisive influence of key physical parameters such as pore size, specific surface area, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, and swellability on separation efficiency. It provides an in-depth analysis of the spatial matching between pore size and target molecules, the nonlinear relationship between specific surface area and adsorption capacity, and the mechanisms by which mechanical strength and swelling behavior constrain the long-term stability of the membranes. Addressing the common bottlenecks faced by MIMs “high mass transfer resistance and poor accessibility of recognition sites” this paper critically summarizes cutting-edge morphological optimization strategies, such as multi-level pore construction, nanocomposite reinforcement, and surface topological engineering, aiming to elucidate how microstructural regulation can achieve a synergistic enhancement of both high throughput and high selectivity. Finally, by reviewing breakthroughs in MIMs applications for biomedical extraction and environmental pollutant remediation, this review not only clarifies the principles governing material suitability across different scenarios but also provides a systematic technical reference for the development of next-generation, high-performance, industrial-scale MIMs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: