Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-cultural experiment investigates how cultural orientations affect phishing victimization and recognition in university students, suggesting training may be key.
Background: Humans remain a critical vulnerability in the cybersecurity chain. While research has explored various behavioral factors influencing phishing susceptibility, the role of national culture and individual cultural orientations remains under-researched, representing a significant gap in the literature. Aims: This study investigates the impact of individual cultural orientations on phishing victimization, while taking into account other relevant factors, such as self-control, risk-taking, technical training, email management practices, demographics (age and gender), and country-level economic and ICT development. Methods: Data were collected via an online survey of university students (N = 2143) across 12 countries in Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Outcomes measures included phishing victimization, phishing recognition, and legitimate email recognition; the last two measures were assessed via scenarios. Data were analyzed using Signal Detection Theory and mixed modelling. Results: Phishing victimization was significantly associated with low self-control, high risk-taking, high exposure, and poorer recognition of legitimate emails. Conversely, cultural orientations, religiosity, and country of origin had minimal effects. While phishing recognition was unrelated to victimization, the ability to recognize legitimate emails reduced victimization risk. For culturally diverse organizations, these findings suggest that cultural factors may be less critical to phishing victimization than has been previously assumed. Training users and improved self-control techniques may help protect against phishing victimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: