Key result
High-variability ABPM cluster is linked to ~63% higher cardiovascular risk versus lowest-risk profile.
Why the study?
Complexity of 24-hour ABPM data hinders interpretation, prompting investigation into whether a clustering algorithm could integrate 24-hour ambulatory BP and its variability into distinctive clusters associated with CV outcomes.
Does machine learning-driven clustering of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings predict adverse cardiovascular events in community-dwelling individuals?
Cohort (n=2,563)
Yes
Does machine learning-driven clustering of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings predict adverse cardiovascular events in community-dwelling individuals?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning-driven clustering of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings identifies distinct patient phenotypes with significantly different long-term cardiovascular risks, independent of traditional risk factors.
Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (24-hour ABPM) is considered the best out-of-office BP measurement to assess hypertension. Yet, the complexity of the obtained data, hinders their interpretation. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether a clustering algorithm could facilitate the integrative interpretation of 24-hour ambulatory BP and its variability to construct distinctive clusters associated with cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. In 1344 community-dwelling individuals (mean age, 46.9 years; 50.6% women), we acquired 24-hour ABPM recordings, clinical data at baseline and we collected adverse outcomes (median follow-up time 19.4 years). We used dynamic time warping combined with the k-medoids clustering algorithm on the heart rate, systolic and diastolic BP recordings. Clinical characteristics and CV outcome were used to evaluate the validity of the derived clusters using the original cohort, while an external general population cohort (n = 1219) was used for further validation. We separated the dataset into 4 clusters. Cluster 1 showed the most favourable CV risk profile comprising younger individuals with the lowest 24-hour ABPM patterns. On the contrary, cluster 4 revealed the worst CV profile with older participants, higher office and 24-hour ABPM, higher medication intake and the highest BP variability. After adjusting for traditional risk factors, including office systolic BP cluster 4 had significantly higher risk of adverse CV events compared to cluster 1 (HR: 1.63; 95%CI:1.15-2.32; P = 0.006). Similar findings were made in the external validation cohort. Time series clustering of ABPM recordings may facilitate the integrative interpretation of 24-hour ambulatory BP and BP variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntalianis et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Community-dwelling individuals (n=2,563). Cluster 4 (highest 24-hour ABPM and BP variability) vs. Cluster 1 (lowest 24-hour ABPM patterns) was evaluated on Adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.15-2.32, p=0.006). Individuals in ABPM Cluster 4, characterized by the highest blood pressure and variability, had a significantly higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared to Cluster 1 (HR 1.63).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: