Key result
Available evidence favors ranolazine over trimetazidine as an effective anti-anginal agent that also lowers HbA1c in patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes.
Why the study?
Are non-haemodynamic anti-anginal agents (ranolazine and trimetazidine) effective for managing angina and improving glycaemic control in patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus?
Are non-haemodynamic anti-anginal agents (ranolazine and trimetazidine) effective for managing angina and improving glycaemic control in patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus?
Ranolazine may represent a valuable therapeutic option in stable coronary artery disease patients with diabetes mellitus due to its anti-anginal efficacy and HbA1c-lowering effects.
Optimal anti-anginal therapy in CAD with diabetes lacks dedicated evidence; leaves open targeted trials to guide this high-risk group.
Patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant diabetes mellitus tend to have more extensive vessel disease than non-diabetes mellitus coronary artery disease patients, are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular events and suffer from a great anginal burden. Very few trials have specifically addressed the issue of optimal anti-anginal therapy in coronary artery disease patients who also have diabetes mellitus. Among 'classical' anti-anginal agents, recent guidelines do not specifically recommend any molecule over others; however, European Society of Cardiology guidelines acknowledge that favourable data in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease are available for trimetazidine and ranolazine, two anti-anginal agents with a non-haemodynamic mechanism of action. The aim of this article is to review available evidence supporting the anti-anginal efficacy of these two drugs in the difficult-to-treat population of diabetes mellitus patients, including their effects on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), a measure of medium-term glycaemic control. Although direct head-to-head comparisons have not been performed, available evidence favours ranolazine as an effective anti-anginal agent over trimetazidine in this population. In addition, ranolazine lowers HbA1c, indicating that it may improve glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Conversely, scanty data are available on the metabolic effects of trimetazidine in this cohort of patients. Thus, ranolazine may represent a valuable therapeutic option in stable coronary artery disease patients with diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosio et al. (2015) conducted a review in Stable coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Ranolazine and trimetazidine was evaluated on Anti-anginal efficacy and effects on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Available evidence favors ranolazine over trimetazidine as an effective anti-anginal agent that also lowers HbA1c in patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: