Key result
An XGBoost machine learning model using diagnostic and operation codes predicted postoperative 90-day mortality with an AUROC of 0.840, outperforming the Operation Frailty Risk Score (0.607) and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (0.588).
Why the study?
Does an XGBoost machine learning model improve the prediction of postoperative 90-day mortality compared to OFRS and HFRS in older patients undergoing emergency surgery?
Cohort (n=22,448)
Yes
Does an XGBoost machine learning model improve the prediction of postoperative 90-day mortality compared to OFRS and HFRS in older patients undergoing emergency surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.84% vs 0.607%
An XGBoost machine learning model using diagnostic and operation codes significantly improves the prediction of 90-day postoperative mortality in older emergency surgery patients compared to existing frailty risk scores.
May aid preoperative risk stratification in older emergency surgery patients; leaves open whether ML models warrant prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Prediction of preoperative frailty risk in the emergency setting is a challenging issue because preoperative evaluation cannot be done sufficiently. In a previous study, the preoperative frailty risk prediction model used only diagnostic and operation codes for emergency surgery and found poor predictive performance. This study developed a preoperative frailty prediction model using machine learning techniques that can be used in various clinical settings with improved predictive performance. METHODS: This is a national cohort study including 22,448 patients who were older than 75 years and visited the hospital for emergency surgery from the cohort of older patients among the retrieved sample from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. The diagnostic and operation codes were one-hot encoded and entered into the predictive model using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) as a machine learning technique. The predictive performance of the model for postoperative 90-day mortality was compared with those of previous frailty evaluation tools such as Operation Frailty Risk Score (OFRS) and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The predictive performance of the XGBoost, OFRS, and HFRS for postoperative 90-day mortality was 0.840, 0.607, and 0.588 on a c-statistics basis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using machine learning techniques, XGBoost to predict postoperative 90-day mortality, using diagnostic and operation codes, the prediction performance was improved significantly over the previous risk assessment models such as OFRS and HFRS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Emergency surgery in older patients (n=22,448). XGBoost machine learning model vs. Operation Frailty Risk Score (OFRS) and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) was evaluated on Predictive performance for postoperative 90-day mortality (AUROC). An XGBoost machine learning model using diagnostic and operation codes predicted postoperative 90-day mortality with an AUROC of 0.840, outperforming the Operation Frailty Risk Score (0.607) and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (0.588).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: