Key result
Youth with Fontan circulation scored 0.18 to 0.99 standard deviations below normative means across domains of attention, executive functioning, academic achievement, and intellectual ability.
Why the study?
Youth with Fontan circulation are at risk for attention and executive functioning impairments, but the relationship between these weaknesses and outcomes in other neurobehavioral domains required investigation.
Cross-Sectional (n=93)
Youth with Fontan circulation exhibit significant weaknesses in attention, executive functioning, and adaptive behavior compared to normative populations, highlighting the need for routine neuropsychological evaluation.
May warrant neurocognitive evaluation in Fontan patients; leaves open efficacy of targeted interventions.
Youth with Fontan circulation (Fontan) are at-risk for impairments in attention and executive functioning (EF) due to a confluence of genetic, prenatal, surgical, and medical risk factors. We sought to describe attention and EF in this population, measured via standardized performance-based tests and caregiver rating scales. We then examined how weaknesses in attention and EF were related to outcomes in other neurobehavioral domains, including adaptive behavior and academic achievement. Our sample included 93 youth with Fontan who were referred for neuropsychological evaluations as part of standard clinical care. The cohort as a whole measured between 0.18 to 0.99 standard deviations below normative means across domains of attention, EF, academic achievement, and intellectual ability. In addition, caregiver-reported concerns for attention, EF, anxiety, and depression were elevated, and approximately 0.35 to 0.85 standard deviations above normative means. Lastly, caregiver-reported adaptive behavior measured 0.93 to 1.24 standard deviations below normative values. Academic outcomes were differentially affected by demographic and attention/EF variables, while depression and caregiver-reported EF predicted adaptive behavior. Findings from this study underscore the importance of routine neuropsychological evaluation as part of comprehensive, multidisciplinary care for individuals with Fontan, with the goal of enhancing neurobehavioral and functional outcomes across the lifespan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jassal et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Fontan circulation (n=93). Fontan circulation vs. Normative means was evaluated on Attention, executive functioning, academic achievement, and intellectual ability. Youth with Fontan circulation scored 0.18 to 0.99 standard deviations below normative means across domains of attention, executive functioning, academic achievement, and intellectual ability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: