Key result
Dabigatran proves cost-effective vs warfarin for AF stroke prevention at €7742 per QALY gained.
Why the study?
Dabigatran was recently approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, but its cost-effectiveness compared with warfarin in Sweden needed to be estimated.
Is dabigatran cost-effective compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden?
Is dabigatran cost-effective compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden?
Dabigatran is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dabigatran cost-effectiveness in Sweden; leaves open real-world applicability beyond modeled assumptions.
AIMS: Patients with atrial fibrillation have a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events such as ischaemic stroke, and patients are therefore recommended to be treated with anticoagulation treatment. The most commonly used anticoagulant consists of vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin. A new oral anticoagulation treatment, dabigatran, has recently been approved for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran as preventive treatment of stroke and thromboembolic events compared with warfarin in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden. METHODS AND RESULTS: A decision analytic simulation model was used to estimate the long-term (20-year) costs and effects of the different treatments. The outcome measures are the number of strokes prevented, life years gained, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Costs and effect data are adjusted to a Swedish setting. Patients below 80 years of age are assumed to start with dabigatran 150 mg twice a day and switch to 110 mg twice a day at the age of 80 years due to higher bleeding risk. The price of dabigatran in Sweden is €2.82 (Swedish kronor 25.39) per day for both doses. The cost per QALY gained for dabigatran compared with warfarin is estimated at €7742, increasing to €12 449 if dabigatran is compared with only well-controlled warfarin treatment. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran is a cost-effective treatment in Sweden, as its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is below the normally accepted willingness to pay limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2012) studied Atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Cost per QALY gained (€7742 per QALY gained). Dabigatran is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation, with an estimated cost of €7742 per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: