Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Special issue examines how duration of study abroad affects linguistic skills, suggesting clearer LoS definitions are needed.
This special issue brings together articles which explore the highly contested, yet under-researched, impact of length of stay (LoS) of study abroad (SA) on the development of various aspects of the linguistic repertoire. It positions LoS as a significant complex variable interacting with myriad interconnected elements and which should be considered a central factor in all SA research. We argue for clearer specifications of LoS to be used throughout SA research, ensuring well-founded justifications for why different LoS may generate divergent linguistic outcomes. We start with an evaluation of how LoS is operationalized. We then provide a general overview of its impact, before turning our focus to how LoS relates specifically to the elements of the linguistic repertoire addressed by the papers in this special issue — namely oral proficiency, lexical, grammatical, and sociopragmatic development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magliacane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: