PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 18, 2026Expert Review of Vaccines0 citationsOpen Access

Healthcare professionals’ perspectives and preferences regarding adolescent meningococcal disease vaccination in the United States

View Full Paper
OHOscar Herrera-RestrepoLBLaurie BatchelderTPThatiana Pinto

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess healthcare professionals' perspectives on new meningococcal vaccination guidelines for adolescents, focusing on the MenABCWY vaccine.
  • Online survey conducted in May - June 2025 among US healthcare professionals recommending meningococcal vaccines for 16-23-year-olds.
  • Responses analyzed descriptively.
  • 73.2% of healthcare professionals felt the MenABCWY vaccine adds significant value to the vaccination program.
  • Nearly 50% preferred a two-dose MenABCWY schedule over the ACIP recommendation.
  • 84.8% of HCPs expressed concern about removing MenACWY vaccination for 11-12-year-olds.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a vaccine-preventable, serious disease. In 2023-2024, the United States (US) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) proposed revisions to the adolescent meningococcal vaccine schedule. This survey aimed to understand healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perspectives on these revisions and the potential role of the meningococcal serogroups A, B, C, W, Y (MenABCWY) vaccine. METHODS: An online survey was conducted in May - June 2025 among US HCPs who regularly recommend meningococcal vaccines for 16-23-year-old patients. Responses were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Of 302 HCPs, 73.2% felt the MenABCWY vaccine provides significant value to the meningococcal vaccination program, and almost half preferred a two-dose MenABCWY schedule over the ACIP recommendation, wherein a MenABCWY dose is followed by a MenB dose. Most HCPs indicated concern with removing MenACWY vaccination for 11-12-year-olds (84.8%). Comparatively, fewer were concerned about changing the MenB vaccine recommendation from shared clinical decision-making to risk-based (60.6%) and administering the second MenB dose closer to college entry (48.7%). CONCLUSIONS: While HCPs were receptive to revisions that simplify the vaccine schedule, this was not without concerns. The adolescent vaccination platform is essential to ensure continued protection against IMD; any changes will require clear, evidence-based guidance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herrera-Restrepo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5b178d18557b26c2039a6ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2026.2696617
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper