Explores objective metrics predicting venture survival, suggesting improved decision-making in entrepreneurship support.
Venture evaluations determining the allocation of supporting resources in the innovation system are often based on decision-makers’ intuition. These evaluations in general fail to predict venture survival to a satisfactory extent. Thus, this paper contributes to the academic debate around the prediction of early-stage venture survival by providing evidence for the usefulness of objective measures. Its main contribution to entrepreneurship practice is a potential improvement of entrepreneurship support decision-making. We capture ventures’ dynamic capabilities by measuring transaction relations from business plans and compare the predictive power of this objective measure to a subjective, intuitive judgement on venture survival for the respective business plans and start-ups. Analyses based on a sample of 272 early-stage new technology-based firms suggest that the objective measure does not only outperform the best prediction based on the sample mean but also reaches a significantly higher survival prediction accuracy than the subjective, intuition-based evaluations. It is argued that there is potential for further improving the predictive power reached with objective measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ungerer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: