Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proteomic methods examine how signaling networks change in response to genetic alterations and treatments, indicating new therapeutic strategies.
Cellular processes are controlled by interconnected networks of protein–protein interactions that can be dynamically regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation. Dysregulation of signaling pathways can drive cellular transformation and contribute to cancer treatment resistance. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based approaches have emerged as key technologies to study both protein function and their dynamic regulation at a network level. Modern proteomics allows investigators to study how signaling networks are rewired in response to genetic lesions, external cues, and targeted therapies, enabling the comparison of baseline (steady-state) networks to perturbed states. Here, we briefly describe key advancements in proteomics to study signaling dynamics, including affinity-purification combined with MS, proximity proteomics (e.g., BioID, APEX), and phosphoproteomics. We highlight how proteomics has led to the identification of comprehensive protein–protein interaction networks, to the delineation of protein subcellular localization maps and to discoveries regarding their dynamics and rewiring in disease. Finally, we comment on the future directions of proteomics to study signaling dynamics, enabled by next-generation MS instruments and AI-driven data analysis, and discuss how these developments are paving the way for clinical translation by bringing quantitative network biology into patient-relevant contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dionne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: