Demonstrates improved voltage regulation in electric vehicles, suggesting enhanced stability and efficiency.
This paper proposes a unified methodological framework for a novel model predictive controller for regulating the output voltage of DC–DC buck converters supplying auxiliary loads in electric vehicles. The proposed controller explicitly incorporates engineering-oriented design specifications and guarantees robust stability and performance in terms of bounded overshoot and settling time, with zero steady-state error in the presence of parametric uncertainties in the converter. The optimal control action is analytically obtained by minimising a cost function based on quadratic terms of the voltage error, the integral of this error, and the inductor current. Only two scalar weighting factors need to be tuned offline, through a systematic and reproducible design procedure, in order to meet the desired performance specifications under parametric uncertainties, based on closed-loop eigenvalue location inside a prescribed sector in the unit circle. The resulting controller corresponds to a low-complexity robust state feedback with optimal gains obtained in closed form. The robust stability of the closed-loop system against time-varying parametric uncertainties is also ensured based on Lyapunov functions systematically constructed using linear matrix inequalities. The proposed methodology further integrates systematic tuning via spectral-radius-based analysis and offline robustness verification under parametric uncertainty. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposal, a comprehensive experimental validation is carried out using a Control Hardware-in-the-Loop (C-HIL) framework. The main case study provides results for a buck converter supplying low-power auxiliary loads of electric vehicles at regulated 5 V under sudden variations of load and input voltage. The controller is implemented in real time on a low-cost microcontroller operating at 50 kHz, demonstrating practical feasibility. Comparisons with a nonlinear adaptive controller widely used in the literature highlight the superiority of the proposed approach in terms of transient performance, robustness, and computational efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollweg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: