Narrative review explores halo nevus as a model for melanocyte autoimmunity, revealing insights into immune regulation and resolutions.
Halo nevus (HN), also known as Sutton nevus or leukoderma acquisitum centrifugum, is a melanocytic lesion characterized by a depigmented halo surrounding a central nevus. Although HN is a benign dermatological condition, increasing evidence indicates that HN represents a dynamic in vivo model of melanocyte-directed immune response with relevant implications for autoimmunity, pigmentary disorders, melanoma regression, and tumor immunosurveillance. The pathogenesis is primarily mediated by CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes via interferon-γ-driven pathways, leading to targeted destruction of melanocytes. However, recent studies have highlighted the importance of immune regulatory mechanisms, including PD-L1-expressing neutrophils and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells, which limit excessive immune-mediated damage and may contribute to the self-limited course and repigmentation observed in some lesions. Additional cytotoxic mediators, particularly granulysin, appear to strengthen melanocyte-directed cytotoxicity, while dendritic cells, macrophages, Langerhans cells, neutrophils, and natural killer cells contribute to antigen presentation, tissue remodeling, and immune resolution. HN shares key immunopathogenic features with vitiligo and melanoma regression but differs from both conditions due to its localized, tightly regulated behavior. Moreover, the halo phenomenon is not restricted to melanocytic lesions, supporting the view that it reflects a broader immune pattern rather than a disease-specific entity. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the clinical, histopathological, immunological, diagnostic, and translational aspects of halo nevus. Based on the available evidence, we propose a self-limited melanocyte autoimmunity model to explain the characteristic balance between melanocyte destruction, immune regulation, and spontaneous resolution observed in halo nevi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giulio Tosti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: