Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates superior oxygen evolution performance of Ni(II) complexes over Cu(II) ones, indicating effective catalyst design.
In order to lower the reaction overpotential and energy input during the water electrolysis process, it is crucial to design and develop novel, low-cost, and effcient electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in an alkaline environment. Here, we report the synthesis of 2-formylpyridine-derived ligand, namely, 1( E )- N -(4-nitrophenyl)–2-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide ( HNPhPyHCT ) and its Ni(II) ( [Ni(NPhPyHCT) 2 ] ) and Cu(II) ( [Cu(NPhPyHCT) 2 ] ) complexes. The synthesized compounds were thoroughly characterized by elemental analysis, spectroscopic methods, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and cyclic voltammetry. Further, the electrochemical characterization of Ni(II) and Cu(II) confirmed distinct redox behaviors in aqueous solution for both complexes, with surface-confined processes dominating over diffusion-controlled processes, which is advantageous for catalytic applications. Among the two complexes, [Ni(NPhPyHCT) 2 ] exhibited superior OER activity, achieving a low overpotential of 360 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm –2, whereas [Cu(NPhPyHCT) 2 ] showed low OER activity. When benchmarked against commercial RuO 2, [Ni(NPhPyHCT) 2 ] demonstrated better catalytic performance, with a lower Tafel slope value (41 mV dec –1 ) compared to RuO 2 (114 mV dec –1 ) and a reduced overpotential (360 and 390 mV, respectively), indicating more favorable reaction kinetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: