Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental approach reveals tongue biting can disrupt polygraph accuracy, suggesting new detection strategies.
Polygraph testing remains widely used in forensic investigations to detect deception through physiological responses, yet its reliability is challenged by countermeasures. This study investigated tongue biting as a physiological countermeasure under the Concealed Information Test (CIT) among participants aged 18–25. Physiological responses, including Electrodermal Activity (EDA), respiration, cardiograph signals, and Relative Response Magnitude (RRM), were analysed using paired-samples t-tests. Tongue biting produced significant increases in EDA and RRM, generating response patterns resembling deception, while respiration and heart rate remained unaffected. The findings demonstrate that even subtle countermeasures can compromise polygraph accuracy, highlighting the need for improved detection methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aredath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: