Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quasi-experimental study reveals AI-supported CTD-PBL enhances TPACK and collaborative problem-solving skills in physics teachers, suggesting effective integration strategies.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly entering teacher education, yet evidence remains limited on its responsible integration into discipline-specific pedagogical preparation. This study examined whether an AI-supported Collaborative TPACK Competency Development module based on problem-based learning (CTD-PBL) was associated with greater pre–post gains in pre-service physics teachers’ self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and perceived collaborative problem-solving (CPS) processes. Informed by ADDIE, the 8-week module used DeepSeek as a bounded scaffold for collaborative lesson design, feedback, verification, and reflective revision while preserving teacher judgment. An intact-class quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design involved 130 third-year pre-service physics teachers at a public university in western China. Two existing classes were randomly allocated at the class level to CTD-PBL or conventional instruction. Compared with the conventional group, the CTD-PBL group reported higher post-test TPACK scores (M = 4.04 vs. M = 3.40, p < 0.001, d = 1.02) and higher perceived CPS process scores (M = 3.62 vs. M = 3.05, p < 0.001, d = 0.88), with stronger pre–post gains in both outcomes. The findings provide a bounded curriculum design case showing how generative AI can be embedded in physics teacher education through problem-based tasks, collaborative scaffolding, and human verification procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qirui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: