Retrospective cohort study develops risk prediction model for complications in older adults undergoing tibial fracture surgery, suggesting targeted prevention strategies.
Older adults requiring emergency surgery for acute tibial fractures are vulnerable to hospital-associated complications (HACs), but admission-time risk stratification tools are lacking. We aimed to characterize HACs and develop both an ensemble prediction model and a simplified bedside risk score. This retrospective cohort study used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database provided by JMDC Inc. Patients aged ≥ 65 years emergently admitted for tibial fracture (ICD-10: S82, 2014–2025) who underwent surgery within 5 days, with stay > 5 days, were included. The primary outcome was composite HACs during index hospitalization. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation. A Super Learner ensemble was developed and evaluated on held-out test data, and a simplified scorecard was derived using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based feature selection and Weight-of-Evidence transformation. Among 53,186 admissions, 5,193 met eligibility criteria. HACs occurred in 851 patients (16.4%), most commonly delirium (7.5%) and falls/trauma (5.7%). The Super Learner achieved a test-set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.740 (95% CI 0.707–0.772), higher than conventional linear logistic regression (0.724). The most influential predictors were Hospital Frailty Risk Score, dementia, Barthel Index, comorbidity burden, and days to surgery. The simplified 7-variable scorecard achieved a test-set AUC of 0.736 (95% CI 0.703–0.769), stratifying patients into five risk groups (HAC rate: 3.45%–38.64%). HAC risk after emergency tibial fracture surgery in older adults was driven primarily by geriatric vulnerability rather than fracture-specific factors. A simplified admission-time score may support targeted prevention, pending external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: