PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 18, 2026Cogent Business & Management0 citationsOpen Access

Mapping the evolution of fair value accounting research: a bibliometric analysis and future research agenda

View Full Paper
RRRoekhudin RoekhudinNANi Putu Ari AryawatiSISyaiful Iqbal

Key Points

  • This paper aims to map the evolution of fair value accounting research and identify gaps for future study.
  • Utilized bibliometric techniques based on articles from the Scopus database.
  • Conducted a systematic search on fair value accounting and related reporting requirements.
  • Applied descriptive bibliometric analysis, co-citation analysis, topic mapping, and thematic evolution analysis.
  • Intellectual core of fair value accounting research focuses on fair value measurement, value relevance, and IFRS.
  • Governance systems, auditing methods, and institutional frameworks remain largely underexplored.
  • Literature shows a bias towards decision usefulness over accountability perspectives.

Abstract

Fair value accounting has become a prominent measurement basis in financial reporting following its institutionalization through international accounting standards. Although widely adopted, the intellectual growth of fair value accounting research has not been properly traced. The purpose of this paper is to review the development of fair value accounting research, highlight the prominent and under-researched issues, and suggest future avenues for research. In this research, a bibliometric technique was used based on articles from the Scopus database. Using a systematic search technique on fair value accounting and relevant reporting requirements. After thorough screening and filtering, data were examined using descriptive bibliometric analysis, co-citation analysis, topic mapping, and thematic evolution analysis. The results show that the study on fair value accounting is focused on an intellectual core dominated by fair value measurement, value relevance, and international financial reporting standards (IFRS). Conversely, questions of governance systems, auditing methods, institutional frameworks, comparability, and stewardship are largely underexplored. The area is methodologically mature, but the literature is conceptually unbalanced with an emphasis on decision usefulness rather than accountability viewpoints. The paper proposes that future research should go beyond technical measurement concerns and include governance, institutional, and critical accounting views. These findings contribute to the understanding of the intellectual structure of fair value accounting research and provide insights to researchers, standard setters, and regulators who seek to improve the relevance, credibility, and accountability of fair value measurement in financial reporting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roekhudin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5b193518557b26c203acebhttps://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2702776
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing the Value Relevance of Accounting Data After the Introduction of IFRS in Europe2010 · 242 citations
  2. 2Goodwill impairment testing under IFRS: a false impossible shore?2011 · 63 citations
  3. 3Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals2009 · 516 citations
  4. 4Green marketing for sustainability business: A bibliometric analysis2024 · 13 citations
  5. 5Valuation Weights, Linear Dynamics and Accounting Conservatism: An Empirical Analysis2013 · 11 citations