Key result
Multidisciplinary orthogeriatric care balances bleeding and thromboembolic risks in femur fractures with AF.
Why the study?
The coexistence of atrial fibrillation and neck of femur fractures is common in older people and presents complex clinical management challenges, particularly regarding perioperative anticoagulation.
This review emphasizes the need for standardized, multidisciplinary orthogeriatric pathways to manage the competing risks of bleeding and thromboembolism in elderly patients with AF and hip fractures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports multidisciplinary orthogeriatric pathways for AF with hip fracture; leaves open optimal anticoagulation and surgery timing pending prospective trials.
The association of atrial fibrillation (AF) and neck of femur fractures (NOF) are common in old people, creating a complex clinical scenario with significant implications for morbidity, mortality, and healthcare systems. This narrative review explores the bidirectional relationship between AF and NOF, focusing on shared risk factors, pathophysiological links, and challenges in clinical management, and also reviews the benefit of an orthogeriatric model. Advanced age, frailty, osteoporosis, polypharmacy, and cardiovascular comorbidities predispose patients to both conditions, while AF itself increases fall risk through haemodynamic instability, syncope, and adverse effects of rate- or rhythm-controlling medications. Importantly, the physiological stress of hip fracture and subsequent surgery can precipitate new-onset or worsening AF via inflammatory, neurohormonal, and metabolic mechanisms. The main challenge for ortho-geriatricians lies in anticoagulation management and preoperative and postoperative management. While anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic risk in AF, it increases perioperative bleeding risk in patients with NOF, often leading to delays in surgery that are independently associated with poorer outcomes. This review examines the current evidence regarding perioperative anticoagulation strategies, timing of surgery, and postoperative resumption of therapy. In addition, the review examines important outcome parameters such as mortality, stroke, bleeding, length of hospital stay, and functional recovery. This highlights the importance of not only improving multidisciplinary care involving orthopaedics, cardiology, geriatrics, and anaesthesia to optimise outcomes, but also enhancing risk stratification. Standardised perioperative pathways and integrated geriatric–cardiac assessment may help mitigate complications. Therefore, understanding how AF and NOF interact is key to delivering holistic, patient-centred care for an increasingly elderly population in orthogeriatric wards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faherty et al. (2026) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and neck of femur fractures. Perioperative anticoagulation and orthogeriatric care was evaluated. Co-existing atrial fibrillation and neck of femur fractures present complex perioperative challenges requiring multidisciplinary orthogeriatric care to balance bleeding and thromboembolic risks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: