Long-term assessment reveals ecological recovery is influenced by management inputs in the Yellow River Estuary.
Estuaries are highly valuable but increasingly engineered ecosystems, where apparent recovery may reflect direct management inputs rather than autonomous ecological improvement. Existing PSR- and DPSIR-type assessments rarely separate these signals, potentially inflating recovery diagnoses. Therefore, we developed a management-adjusted Pressure-State-Response and Ecological Quality Ratio (PSR-EQR) framework for the Yellow River Estuary (YRE) using a continuous 2003–2022 monitoring record. The 24-indicator framework partitions the Response domain into management-response indicators, such as ecological water supplementation and wetland-protection effort, and biotic-response indicators, such as fish early-life-stage and benthic-community metrics. Each indicator was transformed to a 0–1 EQR using cost-, benefit-, or optimum-type functions against auditable benchmarks, weighted with the Entropy Weight Method, and examined with exploratory PCA after correlation-guided block aggregation. The results showed that the full PSR trajectory was inverted-N-shaped, declining from 0.685 in 2003 to 0.428 in 2016 and rebounding to 0.715 in 2022. The 2016 minimum coincided with severe summer hypoxia (DO = 2.1 mg/L) and opportunistic benthic dominance. After 2019, State and biotic-response indicators improved, but management-response indicators reached benchmark conditions earlier. The ecological-core diagnosis therefore indicated slower intrinsic recovery than the full score, highlighting continuing management dependence. The framework provides a transferable approach for highly engineered estuaries by separating ecological condition from direct management inputs while preserving PSR-EQR comparability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: