Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This randomized trial infers wall properties in turbulent boundary layers, suggesting data assimilation can replace detailed measurements.
Surface roughness influences turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) primarily through the roughness function Δ U⁺ and the equivalent sand-grain roughness height kₛ . Direct determination of kₛ typically requires detailed velocity and wall-shear stress measurements, which are often impractical. As an alternative, this study presents a data assimilation framework that modifies a smooth-wall Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) baseline to match sparse rough-wall particle image velocimetry (PIV) data in the fully rough regime. Through this approach, secondary variables such as the friction velocity, u_τ , and kₛ can be inferred from the assimilated flow fields. The assimilated TBL reproduces experimental velocity profiles within 1% and predicts friction velocity within 1–6% of the experimental measurements. Furthermore, the kₛ values inferred from the assimilation also match the experimental data up to 1%. These results demonstrate the potential of data assimilation as a cost-effective alternative to high-fidelity methods and support the generalisation of the framework to model streamwise-varying roughness by treating kₛ as a function of fetch length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Formichetti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: